EPD Verification: A Complete Guide to Environmental Product Declarations
Everything you need to know about Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), the verification process, and how to successfully achieve EPD certification for your products.
Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) have become increasingly important in sustainable business practices. As a standardized way to communicate the environmental performance of products, EPDs are now required or preferred in many industries, particularly construction, manufacturing, and consumer goods. This guide walks you through everything you need to know about EPD verification.
What Is an Environmental Product Declaration?
An EPD is a verified, standardized document that communicates the environmental impacts of a product throughout its life cycle. Think of it as a “nutrition label” for environmental performance—it provides transparent, comparable information based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology.
EPDs are governed by international standards, primarily:
- ISO 14025: Environmental labels and declarations — Type III environmental declarations
- EN 15804: Sustainability of construction works (for building products)
- ISO 21930: Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works
Why EPDs Matter for Your Business
Market Access
Many green building certification schemes (LEED, BREEAM, DGNB) award points for products with EPDs. In some markets, EPDs are becoming mandatory for public procurement. Without them, you may find doors closing to significant business opportunities.
Competitive Differentiation
An EPD demonstrates commitment to transparency and environmental responsibility. It provides concrete, verified data that sets you apart from competitors making vague sustainability claims.
Supply Chain Requirements
Large corporations increasingly require EPDs from their suppliers as part of Scope 3 emissions reporting. Having EPDs ready positions you as a preferred supplier.
Regulatory Preparedness
With regulations like the EU’s Construction Products Regulation revision and Digital Product Passports on the horizon, EPDs provide a foundation for compliance.
The EPD Process: Step by Step
Step 1: Select a Program Operator
EPDs must be published through a recognized Program Operator. Major operators include:
- The International EPD System (Sweden-based, globally recognized)
- IBU (Institut Bauen und Umwelt, strong in German-speaking markets)
- EPD International
- UL Environment (strong in North America)
Choose an operator recognized in your target markets and industry.
Step 2: Identify the Applicable PCR
Product Category Rules (PCRs) define how the LCA must be conducted for specific product categories. The PCR specifies:
- System boundaries
- Data quality requirements
- Impact categories to include
- Allocation rules
- Functional or declared unit
Your Program Operator will help identify the correct PCR. If none exists, a new PCR may need to be developed—a longer process involving stakeholder consultation.
Step 3: Conduct the Life Cycle Assessment
The LCA forms the technical foundation of your EPD. This involves:
- Goal and scope definition: Clearly define what product, functional unit, and system boundaries
- Life Cycle Inventory (LCI): Collect data on all inputs and outputs
- Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA): Calculate environmental impacts
- Interpretation: Analyze results, identify hotspots
The LCA must comply with ISO 14040/14044 and the specific PCR requirements.
Step 4: Prepare the EPD Document
Structure your EPD according to the Program Operator’s template, typically including:
- Product description and identification
- Functional/declared unit
- System boundaries
- LCA results by impact category
- Additional environmental information
- References and verification statement
Step 5: Third-Party Verification
This is the critical quality assurance step. An independent, accredited verifier reviews:
- PCR compliance: Does the LCA follow all PCR requirements?
- Data quality: Is the underlying data appropriate and well-documented?
- Calculations: Are the LCA calculations correct?
- Consistency: Are assumptions and methodological choices consistent?
- Documentation: Is everything properly documented and traceable?
What Verifiers Look For
Understanding verification criteria helps you prepare better documentation. Key areas of scrutiny include:
Data Sources and Quality
Verifiers examine whether primary data was used where required by the PCR, whether secondary data sources are appropriate and documented, and whether data gaps were handled correctly.
System Boundary Compliance
The PCR defines what must be included. Verifiers check that all required life cycle stages are covered and that any exclusions are justified and within PCR allowances.
Allocation Procedures
When processes produce multiple products, allocation becomes necessary. Verifiers ensure allocation follows the PCR hierarchy (typically: avoid, physical relationship, economic allocation).
Sensitivity and Uncertainty
Good LCAs include analysis of how results change with different assumptions. Verifiers assess whether key sensitivities are identified and documented.
Consistency and Transparency
All assumptions, data sources, and methodological choices must be documented clearly enough that the study could be reproduced.
Common Verification Issues (and How to Avoid Them)
Insufficient Documentation
Problem: Data sources aren’t clearly documented, assumptions are unclear. Solution: Maintain detailed records from the start. Document every data point’s source, age, and geographical relevance.
PCR Non-Compliance
Problem: Missing required impact categories or life cycle stages. Solution: Create a PCR checklist and verify compliance before submission.
Inappropriate Secondary Data
Problem: Using generic data where primary data is required, or data that doesn’t match the technology/geography. Solution: Understand PCR data quality requirements. When primary data isn’t available, document why and ensure proxy data is appropriate.
Calculation Errors
Problem: Mistakes in impact calculations or unit conversions. Solution: Use established LCA software with built-in quality checks. Have calculations independently verified before submission.
The Verification Timeline
A typical EPD verification process takes 4-8 weeks, assuming:
- Complete, well-documented LCA
- Responsive communication with verifier
- Minor clarifications only (no major revisions needed)
If significant issues are found, expect additional time for revisions and re-verification.
Costs and Investment
EPD costs vary significantly based on:
- Product complexity
- Data availability
- PCR requirements
- Program Operator fees
- Verification fees
Budget for the complete process including LCA development, Program Operator registration, and verification fees. While not insignificant, EPDs typically remain valid for 5 years, spreading the investment over time.
Maintaining Your EPD
EPDs require periodic updates:
- Annual check: Confirm data remains representative
- Significant changes: Update if production processes change materially
- Renewal: Complete re-verification before expiration
Building good data collection systems from the start makes maintenance much easier.
How QuaLCA Can Help
Navigating EPD verification can be complex, especially for first-time applicants. QuaLCA offers:
- LCA development compliant with PCR requirements
- Pre-verification review to identify and resolve issues before formal verification
- Verification services through our accredited verifiers
- EPD maintenance support for ongoing compliance
Our experience across industries means we understand both the technical requirements and practical business considerations.
Ready to start your EPD journey? Contact QuaLCA for a consultation on your specific products and markets.
Explore our quality assurance services or find answers in our FAQ.