Choosing the Right LCA Methodology for Your Industry

Not all Life Cycle Assessments are created equal. The methodology you choose significantly impacts your results, their applicability, and their acceptance by stakeholders. Different industries have developed specific LCA approaches tailored to their products, supply chains, and regulatory environments. Understanding these differences is crucial for conducting meaningful assessments.

LCA Methodology Fundamentals

Before diving into industry specifics, let’s clarify what we mean by “methodology.” LCA methodology encompasses:

Impact assessment methods: How environmental flows are translated into impact categories
System boundaries: What’s included and excluded from the assessment
Allocation approaches: How to handle multi-functional processes
Data requirements: What quality and type of data is needed
Reporting formats: How results are communicated

The ISO 14040/14044 standards provide the overarching framework, but leave significant room for methodological choices. Industry-specific guidance fills these gaps.

Automotive Industry

The automotive sector has perhaps the most developed LCA ecosystem, driven by regulation and competitive pressure.

Key Standards and Guidelines

ISO 14040/14044 forms the foundation, but automotive-specific guidance includes:

Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) for various vehicle types
VDA (German Association of the Automotive Industry) guidelines
WLTP (Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure) for use-phase data

Critical Methodological Choices

Use Phase Dominance: For conventional vehicles, the use phase (fuel consumption) typically dominates total impacts. Electric vehicles shift focus to production (especially batteries) and electricity source.

Temporal Considerations: Vehicle lifetimes span 10-15+ years. Future electricity grid decarbonization significantly affects EV assessments. Scenario analysis is essential.

Battery Considerations: EV battery LCAs require careful attention to:

Manufacturing location (energy grid matters enormously)
Battery chemistry evolution
End-of-life scenarios (recycling, second life)

Recommended Approach

Use the PEFCR where applicable for European markets. Ensure use-phase assumptions are clearly documented and sensitivity-tested. Pay special attention to battery supply chain data quality.

Construction Industry

Construction has embraced EPDs more than perhaps any other sector, with well-developed methodology.

Key Standards

EN 15804+A2 is the cornerstone for construction products in Europe, specifying:

Mandatory and optional life cycle stages
Core impact categories
Declared vs. functional unit requirements

ISO 21930 provides international guidance complementing EN 15804.

Life Cycle Stages (EN 15804 Modules)

Stage	Modules	Description
Product	A1-A3	Raw materials, transport, manufacturing
Construction	A4-A5	Transport to site, installation
Use	B1-B7	Use, maintenance, repair, replacement, energy/water use
End of Life	C1-C4	Deconstruction, transport, waste processing, disposal
Benefits	D	Reuse, recovery, recycling potential

Critical Methodological Choices

Functional vs. Declared Unit: Building products are often assessed per declared unit (e.g., 1 kg of product) rather than functional unit, leaving building designers to calculate actual performance impacts.

Module D Handling: Benefits from recycling (Module D) are reported separately to avoid double counting. How to interpret and use this information requires careful consideration.

Service Life Assumptions: Building products may last 20, 50, or 100+ years. Reference service life assumptions significantly impact results.

Recommended Approach

Follow EN 15804+A2 strictly for European markets. Document service life assumptions clearly. Be cautious with Module D claims—they depend on future recycling infrastructure.

Chemical and Plastics Industry

The chemical sector faces unique methodological challenges due to complex value chains and product diversity.

Key Frameworks

Plastics Europe Eco-profiles: Established methodology for polymer production
ICCA (International Council of Chemical Associations) guidelines
Together for Sustainability (TfS) initiative approaches

Critical Methodological Choices

Allocation in Multi-Output Processes: Chemical plants often produce multiple products from single processes. Allocation choices (mass, energy, economic) significantly impact results.

Feedstock Considerations: Bio-based vs. fossil feedstock comparisons require careful handling of:

Land use and land use change
Biogenic carbon accounting
Agricultural practice variations

Recycling and Circularity: Chemical recycling technologies challenge traditional end-of-life assumptions. Methodology for crediting recycled content is evolving.

Recommended Approach

For commodity chemicals, leverage Plastics Europe Eco-profiles where available. Document allocation choices transparently. For novel bio-based materials, conduct sensitivity analysis on land use assumptions.

Textile Industry

Textiles present methodological challenges due to global supply chains and diverse product types.

Key Frameworks

Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) with textile-specific category rules
Sustainable Apparel Coalition’s Higg Index methodology
ZDHC (Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals) guidelines

Critical Methodological Choices

Water Use Assessment: Textile production is water-intensive, but impacts vary enormously by location. Water scarcity-weighted indicators (like AWARE) are increasingly required.

Microplastic Emissions: Methodology for assessing microplastic release from synthetic textiles is still developing. Document assumptions about washing and end-of-life scenarios.

Use Phase Variability: Consumer behavior (washing frequency, drying method, garment lifespan) creates huge uncertainty. Standard assumptions vs. regional variations must be addressed.

Supply Chain Complexity: Textiles may pass through 10+ countries from fiber to finished product. Data quality for upstream processes is often challenging.

Recommended Approach

Use PEF methodology where European regulatory compliance is needed. For water impacts, use regionally-appropriate characterization factors. Document use-phase assumptions clearly.

Cross-Industry Considerations

Impact Assessment Method Selection

ReCiPe 2016: Comprehensive method with both midpoint and endpoint approaches. Widely accepted.

CML-IA: Established midpoint method, conservative approach.

EF 3.0/3.1 (Environmental Footprint): Required for EU PEF studies, becoming more widely adopted.

TRACI: Preferred for North American assessments.

Choose based on your target audience and any regulatory requirements. Document your choice and rationale.

Database Selection

Different industries have preferred databases:

Ecoinvent: Comprehensive, widely accepted, regular updates
GaBi/Sphera: Strong in automotive, chemicals
Industry-specific databases: Plastics Europe, WorldSteel, etc.

Avoid mixing databases without understanding methodological differences.

Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis

Regardless of industry, robust LCA includes:

Parameter uncertainty: Variation in input data
Scenario uncertainty: Alternative assumptions about future conditions
Model uncertainty: Methodological choice impacts

Document and communicate uncertainty ranges alongside results.

Making the Right Choice

Selecting appropriate LCA methodology requires balancing:

Regulatory requirements: What standards apply in your markets?
Stakeholder expectations: What do customers, investors, or verifiers expect?
Data availability: What methodology can your data quality support?
Comparability needs: Do you need results comparable to competitors?
Future-proofing: How is methodology evolving in your sector?

How QuaLCA Can Help

Navigating methodological choices is where expertise matters most. QuaLCA provides:

Industry-specific guidance on appropriate methodology
Standards compliance ensuring your LCA meets regulatory requirements
Peer review of existing studies against industry best practices
Training on sector-specific LCA approaches

Our experience across automotive, construction, chemicals, and textiles means we understand both the technical requirements and business contexts of each sector.

Unsure which methodology fits your products? Contact QuaLCA for a consultation on industry-appropriate LCA approaches.

Explore our quality assurance services or find answers in our FAQ.